When you write background which seems to trip people up in the proposal more than anything else when you write it you’re just listening to what happens you’re listening to the events you’re finding out who the big players are because you know there’s somebody that you know they can say so than crazy and everybody laughs oh that’s great that’s great you know that’s a big dog in the field okay you know that’s a big dog everybody’s listening whoever he’s listening to that’s how you use that google scholar as well but then you find out what hasn’t been done in your field aha you’re going to fill that gap in the research you know everybody’s looked at this problem they haven’t solved it because they haven’t looked at it this way if you know that and can articulate it that proposal almost writes itself. Get to know some strategies for communicating with committees at Robotdon.

I’m kind of teasing it doesn’t but you know everybody has an outside member on their committee is that correct okay I write my audience is the outside member my audience in my head when I’m writing I’m not writing to my chair who is an expert in my particular topic I write to the outside member because if the outside member on your committee can understand your proposal then everybody in your committee can understand the proposal and that means explaining a lot of things that you want a shortcut everybody knows that using these acronyms and these things and blah blah if you’re outside committee member doesn’t understand it explain it so explain everything Theory’s methyl methodologies key terms that your committee members you’ll be surprised they may not be experts on the theory that you’re using so explain it this two things one it informs committee members who aren’t familiar with your research about what you’re doing but there’s even something more subversive it also tells your committee that you know what you’re talking about as well this is I’m going to get in the nuts and bolts if you guys don’t mind how to write it because there are a lot of people can have stuck in abstraction about how to do your proposal.

But I want to talk about some of the things that trip people up and help you with that if I can so really what you’re doing in that background is you’re saying what do other people say okay what do experts in the field say about X well a number of studies have suggested that what are commonplace opinions on X it is accepted practice too and that may be assumptive that is accepted practice too you have to be careful about that but what does everybody buy what does everybody believe what does every what is the standard practice what do people apply or assume what are both sides of the argument and those are the things that you can find in the literature and you want to indicate back to your committee okay what are people talking about what are t people talking about then you position yourself in that argument well this is what someone so it says and I agree with that but here okay even in life sciences and so forth.

Let’s us talk about how to structure an academic essay. So, there are three parts, introduction, the body and conclusion. As I have already told you in introduction, you state the basic premise, and how you are going to approach it, whether you agree or disagree, what is your opinion, are you taking a stand, are you applying any theory here. And introduction could be in 3 to 4 sentences, it can also be in one lengthy paragraph, but you cannot have paragraphs, after paragraphs of introduction. Body of the essay can have several parts, you can speak go on talking about for in one paragraph and give several justifications; remember each paragraph has to have one main point, one central point, you can go on and on non for about for and then you can go on and on non about against. Body can always have several paras. Conclusion is the summary of what you have of the stand that you have taken, and whether you agree, disagree, giving your opinion. So, you have to reiterate more firmly.

Remember in conclusion, you do not bring about a new point, I have been saying this, but this is also possible. So, please summary is or conclusion is like summarizing and tying up threads, it’s is not starting a new thread or a strand here. So, you have to remember that. So, we will be doing, how to write a paragraph and we will also be doing how to write more academic kinds of essays in our subsequent classes. But before we do that let me introduce you to linking words that is the second part of our talk today or our lecture today. You know words in English and you know what they mean, but there are words that we use to join our ideas correctly, these words are called linking words. Please take a look at these slides. How we sequence ideas in within a given within the body of an essay. So, we may say firstly, we may say secondly, but don’t not over use this firstly, secondly, thirdly fourthly.

Firstly and secondly are good enough then you can always say finally, first of all; we can also say instead of firstly and first of all to begin with. Instead of saying secondly, hence something like that you can always say next, so it is sequencing of ideas. Finally, lastly in conclusion, again you are sequencing your ideas. Let’s us look at this slide, how you express contrast. This is true, but still there are some problems with it; however. So but, however, on the other hand, in contrast, nevertheless, yet, these words express contrast. Look at this slide, these word express conditions; if, unless, when, whether. And when you want to give reason for something because, due to, as, owing to. And when you want give examples – for instance, for example. Look at this slide; it’s is a useful slide for you for looking at references on academic writing. Now, let me do one sample text with you; this is about referential words.

You need to be debating something I cannot be like um girls like no it cannot be like just flowers are beautiful you know like that doesn’t even make sense but I mean like it cannot be effect it needs to be like it needs to say something that can be arguable you know so it needs to be specific as specific as possible I just narrow it down to really like one thing because the brother you get the harder it’s gonna be to like get the points get the marks for the thesis statement and yeah make sure to focus only on main point. Check out useful essay articles on Edusson.

Don’t go in different direction just follow one single point through your essay this is a really really basic thesis statement it was in my first english class in college I was not that good it was my first time today in English oh this is really basic but I mean like this is as basic as it gets oh it’s not complicated and there’s not like any it’s really like the way you need to build it because I didn’t know when you want anything else back then no I go all fancy and all but I mean if you do that you can get all the morgue so just do that the thesis statement I made was for a a an essay on short stories and I was talking about being called by family so that’s it doesn’t need to be really brother than that um so yeah my thesis statement is the short story is separating by John Updike and the poem i go back to me 1937 by sharon olds both examine the representation of family and the fame that it cause its member.

Basically like you need the topics so the topic is a short story by John Updike in the poem I go back to my 1987 by sharon olds so this is the topic and the argument is the representation of family and the pain that it can cause its member so yeah and like the way you build it is just like a topic and then you have the argument and you put like a word dad like exhibit examine is a good word I don’t have any ideas of other words actually because I had papers on that I have I have a lot of documentation on writing essays but it was in my first english class so it’s like somewhere under my bed and my mom so I don’t have it with me like I said this is really basic so after you read this thesis statement the next thing you’re going to do it in a plane and is actually like the base of your essay I guess so what you’re going to do is you’re going to select the topics you want to talk about that are going to be arguing what you said in your thesis statement so like I said if you use color coding is going to be really easy because you can choose like okay so based on the thesis statement things I could use our pink purple and green so then you just like think those and you can just try to build it.

The education field can be one of the most rewarding careers available. Although the pay is considered relatively low, educators have the opportunity to make an impact on the leaders of tomorrow. The following list describes some of the top paying jobs in the education field that can be just as rewarding as a regular classroom teacher.

Adult Literacy and GED Teachers:

Adult literacy and GED teachers teach persons who are out of school to speak English, reading, writing, and other basic skills. It is also the instructor’s responsibility to help some students earn their GED or high school diploma. Adult literacy and GED teachers are required to have a bachelor’s degree and a teaching certificate. These types of instructors make about $47,000 per year. 

Btw, I found top site for hire essay writer. Essays help 24/7 can make your essay the best!

Education Administrators:

Education administrators are responsible for ensure that academics, student services, and research at colleges and universities are running properly. The responsibilities of the education administrator may vary depending on the area of the school that they manage. Most of the people that are educational administrators have been teachers previously; however that is not a requirement. Education administrators are required to have a master’s degree. Their average salary is about $84,000 a year.

Post-secondary teachers:

Post-secondary teacher instruct students that have completed their high school careers. They are not limited to any specific area of study, but have a wide variety of options to choose from. These teachers have jobs at private colleges, universities, community colleges, vocational schools and junior colleges. The type of education required to be a post secondary teacher varies depending on what subject will be taught as well as the type of institution. Although it is usually required for professor to have a Phd., a Master’s degree may suffice at some junior colleges or vocational schools. The average salary is about $63,000 per year.

School counselors:

School counselors are responsible for ensuring that students stay on the right path to a successful school career. They guide the students in what types of classes would be best for them to take as well as aiding them in social skills. School counselors also aid in guiding the students on what type of educational program best fits their needs. In order to become a counselor some institutes require that their employees be credentialed and all counselors must have a master’s degree. School counselors make an average of $53,500 per year.

Special education teachers:

There is a high demand for teacher certified in special education. Their duties include instructing students with disabilities of varied severity including mental, physical, learning and emotional disabilities. It is the responsibility of the instructors to ensure that the material is modified and structured to best fit the needs of the students. Depending on the severity of the disability, the teacher focuses on basic communication skills, independent living skills and basic math. Special education students are required to have a bachelor’s degree and teacher’s certification. The annual salary is usually $53,000 per year.

Bible as a record of the interaction between the Hebrew people and their God

History, according to the Biblical understanding, provides a learning experience The Divine Covenant and Human Responsibility: It is up to the humans to apprehend and abide by the transcendental order Divine expectation of fundamental moral conduct from everyone: Humans do not excel at governing themselves when left to follow their own conscience? Repeated renewal of the covenant through Noah, Abraham, and Moses: Genesis and Exodus Covenant relationship implies a binding relationship between two groups: Ideals of choice and acceptance Abraham as an example.

Function of Revelation and Prophecy: Instances of communication between the Transcendental power and humans Revelation as an divinely directed event which has a special significance for those who share a particular worldview Tension between the way things are and the way they ought to be: Biblical view of history incorporates a hope for change for the better Exodus: Metaphor of emergence from slavery to a people with a destiny and purpose Questions of Justice: Prophets, Kings, and Social Reform : Emergence of political identity of the Hebrew people and the associated social problems.

Gradual settlement of the freed slaves from Egypt in Canaan:
From a loose tribal confederation ruled by informal chieftains (Shophetim or Judges) : Samson, Shamgar, Ehud, Deborah etc. To a centralized monarchy: Saul, David, Solomon Construction of the Temple: Priestly and Legal authority.

Emergence of Monotheism focused on the worship of Yahweh. Secession of the northern tribes (Israel), centered around Samaria, in 922 B.C.E. and their dispersal in 722 B.C.E. by the Assyrian invasion Southern tribes(Judah), centered around Jerusalem, continued until the Babylonian invasion in 586 B.C.E.

The Prophetic Tradition:

Based upon intensely personal, ecstatic experience of individuals: Voice of social conscience. Worked from both inside as well as outside the social, and political institutions of the community Prophets proclaim for God against all unrighteousness and disloyalty against Yahweh.

3 stages of the Prophetic tradition:

1. Guild Prophets.

2. Pre-Writing Prophets (Nathan’s prophecy to David in Samuels II, ch 12 ) : Prophetic experience underscores God’s demand for justice; against individual acts of corruption?

3. Writing Prophets (Amos, Isaiah etc,): Challenged the corruption implicit in the social order and institutions.

Whenever you want to travel to any destination it’s important to note what you have at your disposal before going away. Do you have enough time and resources to go away? Have you planned your itinerary beforehand so you know what to do once you get there? Is your passport and traveling documents up-to-date? Will you go alone or with a companion? And so on. Is it uncommon to go away without any planning beforehand right? In the same way, how can you improve your life before getting to know yourself?

The starting point of any voyage is just as important as the place of arrival. The same occurs in life. Before you endeavor to improve upon yourself, you identify who you are, what you believe in, what your values and standards are, and I believe, you should question them wholeheartedly. You pinpoint what’s holding you back from success so you know exactly what you need to do to improve, change or discard. It’s not an easy task I know, there are obstacles, difficulties and even people who will get in your way toward success. But let’s be honest, anything worthwhile in life takes a decision, courage, determination, discipline, and several valuable attributes that many aren’t willing to develop.

Life is paradoxical because if you are comfortable with yourself now, life will be tough on you, but when you work hard on yourself, life will be extremely comfortable with you. Hence, the reason why successful people enjoy better lifestyles than others because they value the attributes I just mentioned and have hard-working mentalities that caused the results they now enjoy. Therefore make a commitment in this very moment to work hard on yourself so that you too live the rest of your life the way you really want to live it.

Trina Paulus once said, How does one become a butterfly? You must want to fly so much that you are willing to give up being a caterpillar. Many opt to remain caterpillars all their lives and can’t see themselves as butterflies. To become a butterfly you must stop being who you are so you become who you were meant to be in the first place. If you want to have a new wardrobe, for instance, you must give away your old clothes first, so that you make space for new ones, don’t you? The same principle applies when you want to become a better person: You change the dominating thoughts that occupy your mind and reprogram yourself with a new mentality.

Jack Canfield said, “Say no to the good to say yes, to the excellent” Ships are safe in the harbor, but is that what ships were built for?

I have created a FREE eBook so that you’re on your way toward getting to know yourself by identifying your beliefs, values, talents, strengths, as well as your top priorities. Download it for FREE now and take advantage of it! Remember than success is attained by your willingness to pay the price for initial failure, your daily focus in your top priorities, and your personal development should be one of them.

So tell us, what is one thing you’d love to succeed at and are willing to pay the price for?

Leave a comment below if you will.

Cheers, have a great day! =)

One Example: If a guy has trouble saying “I love you” to his wife, what Maamarim might address that by talking about the properties of chessed and yesod, the sefirot corresponding to love (chessed), vulnerability, connection and sexual intimacy (yesod). Once those Maamarim were identified, I thought they might begin to figure out different experiential exercises that can inculcate these concepts and values (articulated in the Maamarim) into the person. After all, people are not brains walking around on bags of meat and very often, emotional pain and trauma that is lodged in the body will only exit by engaging the body.

But none of this happened. Nothing close to it. It pains me deeply but there it is. Many people refused to even go because the Rosh, a wonderful human being and incredible Talmid Chacham (someone who has shown me incredible kindness) has serious anger and communication issues. Others messaged me they won’t go because some of the Rabbanim won’t talk to the other Rabbanim outside of public functions and scheme against the others. Hardly the paragons of healthy happy Jews.  Personally, while I hear that, the value of “accept the truth from those who speak it” would outweigh this if not for the fact that there was no attempt at listening and receptivity to people’s needs nor any attempt at articulation or systemization of Chassidus to address people’s needs.

4 – I feel it prudent to point out that Chabad has never been one to tout Daas Torah and intellectual subservience to Torah Scholars. Think Zalman Moshe and Reb Mendel – need I say more? Therefore I feel it wise to address the Asifa’s points substantively, as I just did above.

5 – Claims that meditation is passul (invalid and unholy) will not hold water. The Rebbe himself, was one of the biggest proponents of using powerful techniques that all sorts of unsavory groups used. The Rebbe didn’t care who created them or how they were currently being used.

2 – There is a serious miscommunication going on. Many people and Rabbi’s see guys going to Shofar and only hear, “I want to feel good” when in reality, guys are saying, “I want to feel” period. They are scared to even feel any emotion. By feel, I mean to reflect on it, give it space and honor it, instead of shutting it down since it doesn’t fit with toxic notions of bittul or kabbalas oyel that they were taught.

In fact, some guys are simply saying, “I want”. Forget about feelings, they’ve never allowed themselves to just be and exist without constant berating and beating of themselves.

Lastly, some guys, by going to Shofar, are simply saying, “I”. They can’t even conceive of having a desire. They are battul be’metziyus. Of course, they’re not emotionally (or intellectually but that’s a different story) resonant with that bittul bemetziyus so they suffer as do their families and friends.

3 – It saddens me to say this and I know this will make some people mad, but it must be said. The Rabbanim last night wasted a wonderful opportunity. Instead of showing up receptive and listening they showed up talking and lecturing. I was hoping to hear, “Ok Chevra, you got our attention. We obviously (as evidenced by over 1800 men going to Shofar) failed to provide for your needs and wants via Chassidus. So help us understand what you feel is missing, help us understand your pain so that we might come to appreciate your suffering and perhaps begin to help you recover.

I thought there might be a hat going around so that people could put in anonymous comments, real questions and burning issues that bother them.

I thought perhaps, there would be an all night marathon of learning and study groups to begin the process of placing various Maamarim and sichos into different slots of issues.

So much has been going on and so many ideas and claims are being thrown around that it’s hard to get clarity. As my thoughts are somewhat disorganized I will do a point-by-point analysis instead of an essay. I will only be addressing those claims leveled against Shofar that are also leveled against overall therapy and mental health. Perhaps I will explain my thoughts on Shofar a different time. But for now, I want to solely discuss the claims, explicit and implicit, made by the Asifa.

  1. Does Chassidus have all the answers? We need to scrutinize this statement quite closely. It is my belief that given the current method of teaching Chassidus, we can safely say, “Chassidus might have all the answers but Chassidim certainly don’t.”

That is to say, we have not yet articulated a clear coherent method for dealing with real life and mental issues via Chassidus. Many people would say we should not be focused on that in the first place. A close friend and mentor said,

“The Alter Rebbe writes in the Hakdamah “ve’eitzah nechonah le’chol davar ha’kasheh alav BAAVODAS HASHEM”. A whole litany of Rabbis invoked this verse in a letter condemning COTS.

But why does he add the two qualifying words “ba’avodas ha’shem”? We are all told about how the Alter Rebbe considered for 6 weeks before writing a certain “vav”… So certainly when it comes to two full words they are precise and layered with meaning.

The answer is one of two.

Option #1) He is teaching us that any problem a yid ever has (“kol davar ha’kasheh alav”) is inherently a part of his “avodas hashem”.

Option #2) The Tanya is telling us that he addresses ONLY issues that are in the realm of Avodas Ha’shem.

Well, according to the first option, Tanya has the answers to a broken leg too, which, everyone agrees is ludicrous.

So we are forced to the second option.

The question now begs itself: the words “ba’avodas ha’shem” are to the exclusion of what?

I maintain that they exclude a person who is struggling with issues of humanity. These are not “avodas ha’shem” issues, for only a human being can serve Hashem, not a half human. In other words, when a person’s Nefesh Ha’behamis is damaged, he is traumatized, injured, etc. the Tanya never claimed to address him! The Tanya only claims to address a HUMAN BEING who is encountering issues in his “Avodas Ha’shem.”

I am inclined to agree with him for the time being. Especially as nowadays, it is my firm belief and experience that, not just is Chassidus not being articulated in a way that can address all problems – quite the contrary. It is being taught in deeply toxic and harmful ways.

Even if Chassidus was meant to address all mental psyche-related issues, there is much work to be done before we can, in good conscience, direct people with real issues to Chassidus for answers.

“I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America…one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.”

           g         Alas, the many months leading to our elections gravely affirms there are two nations under God. Both divided, legalistically bound, and unclear (perhaps, intentionally) about God’s true meaning of justice. The schism is due not only to political ideologies, religious beliefs, worldviews, economic conditions, gender, race, age, geography, and historical experience but in its failure to care for the most vulnerable amongst us and love one another. The manifestation of our divided hearts is well articulated through the words of political aspirants, their supporters, church leadership in the pulpits and across the television screen, in sanctuary pews, and in the deepest closet prayer.


      We find a Biblical parallel with the minor prophet, Amos. In the 8th century B.C., Amos lived in the complexity of two nations under God: the Northern Kingdom of Israel and the Southern Kingdom of Judah. Israel was entrenched in a deep socioeconomic divide, an ancient 99% movement without progress and media spin. The wealthy lived in luxury and extravagance, lavishly decorated homes and appearance, unfair business practices, corrupt and brutally negligent to the needs of the poor. Does it sound familiar?


        God was not pleased and His judgment brewed. Outwardly religious, the Israelites condoned by word and deed dishonest, immoral, and oppressive means to preserve their milieu. Their inner man (heart) truly did not know God and sought not His known character. Amos’ reprimand to find God’s mercy and personal and national course correction applies to us. “Seek good and not evil— and live! You talk about God, the God-of-the-Angel-Armies, being your best friend. Well, live like it, and maybe it will happen. Hate evil and love good, then work it out in the public square. Maybe God, the God-of-the-Angel-Armies, will notice your remnant and be gracious.” (Amos 5:14-15, the Message).


          How do we heal our deeply divided nation? Brother and sister, we must seek forgiveness for dividing that which God made one. “Every kingdom that is divided against itself is brought to desolation, and every city or house divided against itself shall not stand.” (Matt. 12:25; Mark 3:24-25, and Luke 11:17). Most troubling, this “kingdom”, city and house is occupied by those who profess a doctrinal understanding of the faith,  relationship with the Savior, Jesus the Christ and call themselves, Christians. A nation is built upon communities. Individuals, like you and me, form the foundation of the latter. Sincerely, we must repent for our separation from Him and our sins of omission and commission against Him…and others. Harken back to Paul’s remarks to the Colossians, in this reconciliation with God and in bearing with each other and forgiving one another as the Lord forgave, we will be bound together in perfect unity. We heal our divided hearts. Then, only then, we can stand as one before God.